Written by: |
Leslie C. Griffin
William S. Boyd Professor of Law University of Nevada, Las Vegas William S. Boyd School of Law
Andrew L. Seidel
Constitutional Attorney
|
|
From the 5th Edition |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
Public Resources |
 |
|
|
Teacher Resources (Login required)
|
 |
|
|
Contact Information |
 |
|
 |
|
|
Updates to Griffin's Law And Religion Since the Last Edition
Click links below to show/hide updates.
Chapter - I. Free Exercise of "Religion" | A. What is Free Exercise? - 1 update
Page: 18 - End of Section A posted on 8/16/2024Jewish students at UCLA filed a lawsuit arguing they were "excluded from portions of the UCLA campus because they refused to denounce their faith." This occurred when pro-Palestinian protesters occupied portions of the campus. The Jewish students said they had "a religious obligation to support the Jewish state of Israel." The district court concluded their free exercise had been violated. The district court entered an injunction in their favor, stating: "Under the Court's injunction, UCLA retains flexibility to administer the university. Specifically, the injunction does not mandate any specific policies and procedures UCLA must put in place, nor does it dictate any specific acts UCLA must take in response to campus protests. Rather, the injunction requires only that, if any part of UCLA's ordinarily available programs, activities, and campus areas become unavailable to certain Jewish students, UCLA must stop providing those ordinarily available programs, activities, and campus areas to any students. How best to make any unavailable programs, activities, and campus areas available again is left to UCLA's discretion." Is this a good interpretation of what free exercise requires? The case is available at Frankel/.
B. What Is Religion? - 1 update
Page: 29 - End of Note 20 posted on 1/17/2024The white mountain, Mauna Kea, is the highest summit in Hawaii. Astronomers have a lease on the location so they can put all their telescopes there to understand more about the universe. Many Hawaiians believe the volcano is a sacred spot, and say "You do not go up the sacred mountain unless you are called. You do not go up without a purpose." Hawaiian spirituality accepts science. "Our spiritual practice is not faith-based, it is knowledge-based,… Our gods and goddesses are scientific observations." Some people say astronomy and religion can work together to keep the telescopes, but others think the land should be free of this equipment to keep it more sacred. How should any conflicts between the two sides be handled? Should the astronomers' lease be renewed in 2033? Deepa Bharath & Audrey McAvoy, A volcano in Hawaii is sacred to spiritual practitioners and treasured by astronomers, NCROnline, Dec. 28, 2023, MaunaKea.
C. How Shall Courts Define Religion? - 1 update
Page: 45 - End of Chapter posted on 1/13/2025
The Supreme Court granted cert. in Catholic Charities Bureau, Inc. v. Wisconsin Labor & Industry Review Commission, Case. The issue is whether “a state violates the First Amendment's religion clauses by denying a religious organization an otherwise-available tax exemption because the organization does not meet the state's criteria for religious behavior.”
What do you think the Court will say about this issue? Is it affected by how the Court defines religion?
|
| Chapter - II. Introduction to Establishment | |
| Chapter - III. What Is an Establishment of Religion? | A. Religious Symbols and Monuments - 4 updates
Page: 152 - End of Section A posted on 6/20/2024Louisiana passed a law requiring that the Ten Commandments be displayed in public school classrooms. Will the courts uphold this law or invalidate it? What are the arguments you can give for and against the constitutionality of the commandments?
Page: 152 - End of Section A posted on 2/9/2023A frieze at the United States Supreme Court pictures lawgivers. Among them is the Prophet Muhammad, who holds a Quran. Years ago, some Muslim groups tried to get the figure erased from the Court because they believe Muhammad should not be pictured because Islamic tradition does not allow such pictures and showing the face of Muhammad is offensive. Read about the story here, MuhammadFigure. Muhammad remains on the Court's frieze. What do you think of that, given all you have read in the Court's cases?
Page: 152 - End of Section A posted on 2/9/2023Eighteenth century Saint Junipero Serra is famous in California as a Franciscan missionary who founded nine of California's missions. Governor Newsom signed legislation replacing a statue of Serra on state capital grounds with a monument to California's indigenous peoples. Serra has long been accused of mistreating Native Americans and of being part of the Inquisition. Catholics have defended the Serra statues, saying such claims against Serra are outrageous. What do you think should happen to official statues or pictures of Serra? For background, read this story, Serra.
Page: 152 - End of Section A posted on 1/13/2025The Middle District of Louisiana ruled that the law requiring the display of the Ten Commandments in public school classrooms was unconstitutional. It violated the old Court case, Stone v. Graham. The opinion also noted that students might be coerced by having to face the Ten Commandments every day. The law violated the Establishment Clause. See Roake v. Brumley, Case. The case is appealed to the Fifth Circuit. The appellants noted that the plaintiffs did not have standing to challenge the law, and that “offended observer” standing should change, Argument.How should this case turn out? What do you think of the picture in that argument?
B. Public Funding of Religion - 4 updates
Page: 153 - End of Chapter posted on 7/27/2022 CarsonLRCh3EndB.pdf
Page: 153 - End of Chapter posted on 1/13/2024Maine parents of religious school children filed suit against Maine's tuition assistance program, arguing that the program was an attempt to avoid obeying the Court's ruling in Carson v. Makin . They complained about Maine's rules, which “• Imposed a new religious neutrality requirement on schools, stating that “to the extent that an educational institution permits religious expression, it cannot discriminate between religions in so doing”; • Imposed a new religious nondiscrimination requirement on schools; and • Removed the religious exemption that had previously allowed religious (but “nonsectarian”) schools to handle sensitive issues relating to sexual orientation and gender identity in a way that reflected their faith commitments. 5 M.R.S. § 4602(5).” Should Maine win or lose? See MaineTuition.
Page: 199 - End of Section B posted on 2/17/2025The Supreme Court has granted cert. in a case asking whether "public schools burden parents' religious exercise when they compel elementary school children to participate in instruction on gender and sexuality against their parents' religious convictions and without notice or opportunity to opt out." The case is MahmoudvTaylor. What do you think the Court will say on this issue?
Page: 199 - End of Section B posted on 1/24/2025The Oklahoma School Board has approved a Catholic charter school. The school, St. Isidore of Seville Catholic Virtual School, is run by the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Oklahoma City and the Diocese of Tulsa. The Oklahoma governor said this was a "win for religious liberty." The state's attorney general thinks the public funding of a religious school is unconstitutional. Which side would win in the Supreme Court of the United States? See CharterSchool. The Oklahoma Supreme Court ruled that the school violated both state and federal law. The opinion is summarized here Drummond. Do you think the Court understood establishment and free exercise?
The U.S. Supreme Court has granted cert. on Oklahoma's schools. They ask if it violated free exercise for Oklahoma to refuse public charter school status to a Catholic school, or if establishment supports the state's decision. See Oklahoma.
C. The Establishment Clause as a Defense: Equal Access - 4 updates
Page: 204 - Note 2 posted on 2/17/2025A federal district court ordered a school to allow the After School Satan Club to meet on school premises. The school had blocked the group from attending due to public concerns against the group. The court said excluding ASSC violated the First Amendment. Is this consistent with Widmar? See Satan. Why do you think the ACLU brought this case? The case was settled, allowing the group to meet on school premises. The school paid $200,000 to the Satanic Temple and the After School Satan Club for attorneys' fees and costs. Settlement.
Page: 205 - End of Note 3 posted on 2/17/2025Krishna Lunch pled about "its distribution of sanctified vegan and vegetarian food (“prasada”).... While distributing prasada, the organization plans on chanting the names of God and other devotional hymns and songs, speaking with interested students and others of the University of California, Los Angeles (“UCLA”) community, distributing religious literature, and displaying signs depicting reincarnation, animal protectionism, and other topics related to its followers' beliefs." The Ninth Circuit dismissed the free exercise claims but allowed the free speech and association claims to continue. Why? KrishnaLunch.
Page: 205 - End of Note 3 posted on 2/28/2023The Trump and Biden administrations have different approaches to religious issues on campus. Trump passed an executive order allowing the federal government to stop grants to schools that restricted the activities of religious organizations. Biden has proposed a policy to get rid of that rule, saying it is too burdensome and that the First Amendment already protects religious rights so the rule was not necessary. Which approach do you favor? See TrumpBiden.
Page: 205 - End of Note 3 posted on 2/17/2025I handed out this problem in class for students to discuss, assigning them roles for both parties and for the judges. You can read the full opinion about this problem at Wisdom Ministries, Inc. v. Garrett, No. 22-CV-0477-CVE-CDL, 2023 WL 4919660 (N.D. Okla. Aug. 1, 2023). The case was appealed to the Tenth Circuit, so there is a lot to discuss about it. Class Problem. The Tenth Circuit agreed the district court did not have jurisdiction to hear the case, but also noted that a new Oklahoma law allows Wisdom Ministries to issue degrees in Biblical Wisdom. Why would state law allow that? WisdomMinistries.
|
| Chapter - IV. Constitutional and Statutory Protection of Free
Exercise | A. Constitutional Exemptions: From Sherbert to Smith - 1 update
Page: 266 - End of Chapter 4A posted on 7/3/2023What does this free speech case say about free speech, religious freedom, and LGBTQ rights? See 303CreativevElenis.
B. Statutory Exemptions: RFRA - 1 update
Page: 295 - End of Part B posted on 4/6/2024The Indiana Court of Appeals placed an injunction on the state's abortion law, arguing that the state's RFRA requires abortions to be available to religious people. You can read about the dispute INcase.
C. Statutory Exemptions: RLUIPA - 1 update
Page: 326 - Add to Note 9 posted on 10/14/2023On remand from the Court, the district court ruled for the government. The Minnesota Court of Appeals reversed that decision, stating “Because the evidence the government presents does not support the district court's conclusion that the septic-tank requirement furthers a compelling state interest specific to appellants, RLUIPA precludes the government from enforcing the challenged regulations against appellants.”
The Court of Appeals' conclusion also stated “the district court concluded that the government had a compelling interest. In making its compelling-interest findings, however, the district court relied on generalized evidence about the content of gray water, conjecture based on visual observations of appellants' gray water, and speculation about the quantity of water used and discharged by appellants, including the number of households objecting to the septic-tank requirement. Because the record evidence is insufficient to support the district court's conclusion that a compelling interest requires these appellants to use septic tanks, the district court erred in denying appellants any relief in their declaratory-judgment action seeking to invalidate the SSTS [subsurface sewage-treatment systems] ordinance as applied to them. The government, therefore, may not enforce the SSTS ordinance against these appellants based on the existing record. Thus, we reverse and remand for entry of appropriate declaratory and injunctive relief, which includes preventing the government from enforcing the SSTS ordinance against appellants unless and until the government satisfies its burden under RLUIPA.” Mast v. Cnty. of Fillmore, 993 N.W.2d 895, 899, 910 (Minn. Ct. App. 2023). This decision is available here, Mast.
Did this court follow Fulton?
D. The COVID Cases - 1 update
Page: 363 - End of Chapter 4 posted on 1/18/2025The Supreme Court has granted cert. on a case asking if parents of public elementary schoolchildren have a free exercise right to opt out of LGBTQ-themed books. How do you think the Court would rule on this question? See Mahmoud.
|
| Chapter - V. Conscience, Complicity, and Conscientious Objection
Objection | |
| Chapter - VI. Conflicts Between Individual and Institutional Religious Freedom
Religious Freedom | |
| Chapter - VII. Comparative Religious Freedom
Institutionalized Persons Act | |
| Chapter - VIII. Religion and Politics | |
| Chapter - IX. Teaching About Religion and Science | |
| Chapter - X. The Old and New Law of Religion | |
|
|